*** Question 360 security issues

Last week, a microblogging of Fighter Fang Zhouzi kicked off the prelude to Qihoo 360's "war." On October 9th, Fang wrote on Weibo that 360 Secure Browser is not safe at all. It is recommended that special persons such as Simanan be used with caution. Afterwards, the "saliva" was opened. On October 11th, the 360 ​​emergency statement stated that Fang was questioned by Baidu. Fang Zhou immediately stated that he wanted to sue 360 ​​for infringement of the right to reputation.

In these two days, Fang Zhou (Zhou Huqi President Zhou Hongxuan) battles are intensifying. Fang Zhou disclosed the issue of abducting 360 users and uploading user privacy on Weibo for several days. As of the time of the press release, Fang Zhou has revealed Qihoo’s four “safe lies”. Although 360 officials launched a rumored project to respond, Qihoo 360’s share price fell.

Fang Zhou's Big Four Questioned to 360 Security Issues

On October 12th, Fang Zhouzi first forwarded Sina microblogging netizen "Royfly" broke the news "a chopper: 360 gathering privacy programmer level analysis" questioned 360 to steal user privacy. This post points out that 360 security guards frequently upload a large amount of information to the server, uploading a large number of users' information using other software to the server, users cannot know the details of the uploaded information, and cannot prevent the upload of such information. This information will reveal the user's lifestyle, schedule, and more intimate software operations. Subsequently, Fang also released three videos via Weibo. In the 360 ​​mobile phone guards forced users to install the video, although the tester has removed the 360 ​​mobile phone guards, but some of the implementation of documents still remain in the user's mobile phone, and keep reminding users to update. In another video made by the network anti-hacking group, the 360 ​​secure browser continuously uploads the user's private information to the 360 ​​server from the moment it is turned on.

At the same time, Fang also questioned the 360 ​​camouflage system patch "abduction" users. Hu Zhixiang, chief financial officer of the financial department of Dongguan Chuangrui Industrial Test Equipment Co., Ltd., posted a large number of photos on Weibo, and detailedly recorded the entire process of “360 patching the Microsoft system”. Originally, 360 anti-virus software falsely reported to the user that the Microsoft system had loopholes, and then disguised the 360 ​​browser as a Microsoft patch to mislead users to install the 360 ​​browser.

In addition, Fang also revealed the issue of using a 360 browser to log in to the microblog serial number. It is reported that employees of Nanjing Foxconn Software Co., Ltd. have used 360 browsers to apply for postgraduate examinations. Once they are refreshed, they become accounts of others and can modify the registration information. There is no problem using IE and Google Chrome.

Fang's fourth question is that 360 "cloud control" remotely controls the user's computer. According to a screen shot of a 360-degree browser unloaded by a netizen reprinted by Fang, showing that 360 browsers are uninstalled now, a notice will be displayed: “The recent 360 secure browser has been intentionally discredited. If you have any doubts about online rumors, please Click on the proverbial explosion field to understand the truth.” Fang asked, “This shows that the 360 ​​can send commands and parameters to the user's computer at any time to remotely control the client.”

360 on the line rumors channel stocks fell

Fang Zhouzi’s “becoming fierce,” Qihoo 360 was not to be outdone. The founder, Zhou Hongyi, responded in addition to the microblog, and the official even launched a special topic on the buzzword. In this topic, 360 listed the 14 rumors of Fang and responded to them one by one.

For the "360 collection of privacy programmer level analysis" this post, 360 response to the post said the file path, file name, digital signature and other information mentioned in the post, is a common technique used by security software to detect Trojans, has nothing to do with user privacy data. After canceling "Join Cloud Security Plan", 360 will not upload a sample of suspicious programs.

"Since the 360 ​​launch of the search, the 360 ​​browser has been repeatedly discredited by a search giant, so a version of the "uninstallation notice" was added to the version one month ago. The prompt text on the software interface is updated through the version upgrade. This is The most common practice in the software industry is that Fang should verify the old and new versions instead of arbitrarily accusing them.” 360 said that Fang has not verified and issued false information, and 360 Secure Browser and Extreme Browser have all been rigorously audited by Microsoft. Capture the user's Internet access account and password for privacy.

However, Fang also publicly admitted that the evidence of his 360 questioning on Weibo has come from online search. "What verification codes and msconfig are forbidden to start are all words that I forwarded to teach Microsoft's senior engineer Weibo." Fang said in a microblog.

The disagreement between the two sides in this incident also affected the stock price of 360 to a certain extent, causing it to drop sharply. On October 12th, Qihoo 360 shares tumbled 0.69 US dollars, a drop of more than 3%, becoming the largest mid-term loss stocks in the trading day.

Group of station owners dissatisfied with "lying shots" telling 360 to focus on safety issues

Fang has questioned 360 browsers, security guards, and other products that have stolen user privacy information and hijacked users. This has also caused many senior technicians to pay close attention to this phenomenon. On October 13, the heads of the low-key owners expressed their dissatisfaction with the behavior of the 360 ​​in the name of the webmaster in cracking down on his opponents. They were telling 360 not to distract the public and should effectively solve their product safety problems.

The cause is the microblogging of 360 company's chief privacy officer Tan Xiaosheng. Tan Xiaosheng did not answer many questions from Fang Zhouzi on Weibo. Instead, he declared that many individual webmasters were Baidu’s “trick” and asked the webmaster to only issue Fang’s statement and banned any announcements from 360 companies.

As soon as Weibo was issued, some netizens pointed out that Tan Xiaosheng's chat log in the Weibo image was suspected to be fraudulent, and the dialogue employee ID was blocked by mosaics, which was not convincing. “The Valley of the Galaxy outside” commented: “It was only exposed that Baidu's internal mail was forged, and it was interesting to do this again.” More netizens said that “to get rid of the mosaic to know the authenticity!” Fang also praised Tan Xiaosheng. “Is this chief privacy officer the chief gurus? Do you dare to give your privacy to such people?”

"We don't care about Baidu 360, but in the name of the webmaster, the webmasters are lying and shooting!" The famous webmaster and founder of the Moi network, Huang Zixiong, said that 360's guess is that the webmaster is personal. Professionalism's "smearing" behavior.

In fact, Tan Xiaosheng's “trick” remarks were not only met by netizens, but also aroused strong dissatisfaction from the low-profile group of webmasters. Many real-name certified webmasters have publicly stated that they have never received a so-called “password closure” from Baidu, which is “laying and shooting.”

Pang Xueming, a well-known webmaster and founder of Cninin.COM, said: "Since 360 ​​and Baidu, 360 and Fangzhou have played a big battle of words, I always take a wait-and-see attitude. We are completely secretive. It is the legendary senior black. !”

At the same time, the frontline chiefs, such as Shen Ping and the deputy director, who were very influential in the webmasters' circle, also commented that it was unclear why they were "represented." Shen Ping forwarded and said, "I haven't heard of this," and he also ridiculed it 360, which is "a snake shadow."